You know, sometimes it doesn't matter how hard you try.
Advertising cannot help you.
Yesterday in the London Lite, page 6...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e2df/2e2dfe302df770d495df15fb38b617e25a88cb0b" alt=""
Yesterday in the London Lite, front page...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7b48f/7b48f9aed7c19922288a8e4a59f21f2b33f98bd2" alt=""
Hmmm, might be better putting that advertising money into some extra help at the airport.
image 1:
ReplyDeleteTerminal *five* is working
image 2:
Lost baggage at terminal *three*
might be worth looking at your evidence before making your case
I am sure you're quite right about the detail.
ReplyDeleteI scan read the story, and then saw the ad, much like any other member of public would.
I think their take-out will be the same.
The front page headline more than outweighs the ad,
no matter how hard it might be working.
Whether it's terminal 3 or 5 or whatever, the overall perception of the public is still that Heathrow and terminal 5 is a mess.
Even *if* that's not actually the case.
And unfortunately some print ads won't change perception while these headlines are still shrieking out from the front page.
No matter how well-conceived those ads are.